|
The dielectric material used in
most competing corona discharge units is either glass, or ceramic.
Glass and ceramic plate
dielectric must be thicker than mica dielectric
in order to be usable. The greater thickness and properties of glass or
ceramic results in four main negative factors:
1) In-efficiency.
Ceramic and glass dielectric material will require larger transformers and more
energy to create the corona discharge process.
2) Very Fragile.
Ceramic and glass dielectric material is very fragile, is sometimes damaged in
shipping, and cannot be dropped. Just cleaning, or inserting these
materials into their holders can often break them.
3) Heat generation.
Ceramic and glass dielectric material requires more electricity for the corona
process to operate. This creates more heat in the element system which
wears the element and mounting materials more quickly than our close tolerance
mica systems. Excessive Heat also plays a part in possible excessive
nitrogen oxide production -
especially in humid environments.
4)
Ability to clean. In addition, Ceramic element material has a high
failure rate, mostly because of the inability to thoroughly clean oily residue
(built-up during the corona process) from the porous material.
(Don't believe the
one seller out
there that states mica is old technology - theirs
uses glass sandwiched in plastic - using the same corona discharge plate
technology they claim is old. Mica has been
around much less time than glass, is more expensive, and is the best choice.)
Contrary to the
one seller making the false claim,
Glass is in fact the older and cheaper "less-tech" material used, and is not as
well suited for portable ambient air corona discharge ozone generators as
MICA.
More
about MICA.
Why
are UV ozone generators a better choice than corona discharge ozone generators?
(For all air or surface sterilization
Shock treatment applications such as
MOLD, Smoke, Fire odors, musty smells, flood odor,
protein decomposition odor, germ and virus remediation, etc.)
The Biggest difference between corona discharge and UV ozone generation methods
is that UV ozone generators have stable ozone output levels throughout humidity
ranges, while the output of corona discharge ozone generators is
significantly reduced by just moderate humidity levels such as 40–70% (ozone
output is reduced by approx. 40-70% with 40-70% humidity). In addition, with UV
ozone generators, the cleaning
requirement is almost eliminated compared to corona discharge ozone generators.
Also, the ozone produced from a UV ozone generator is cleaner (no nitric acids)
and smells better than ozone produced from corona discharge machines, and is
just as powerful and often more powerful as ozone produced by corona discharge
ozone generators.
UV models include
UV PRO 550,
UV PRO 550AT, UV PRO 1100AT,
UV PRO 2800,
UV PRO 4000,
and
UV PRO 6800
| If you need an ozone generator with adjustable
ozone output, two new models, the UV PRO 550AT or UV
PRO 1100AT are ideal. The "AT" stands for Adjustable with 48 hour
Timer. These models produce the cleanest and sweetest ozone ever
possible - adjustable down to very low levels or high levels for shock
treatments and are much more dependable than corona models on the
market! Please call 866-225-3858 for information or to purchase. |
|